-
-
-
- Thread: Using Multiple Mics on the
Same Console Input
-
- From: Jim Brown
- Subject: Re: Flute miking
-
- When you're miking a lot of players in a section, you
can
- generally Y identical mics on like instruments in pairs
- into an input.
-
- Jim Brown
- Audio Systems Group, Inc.
- Chicago
-
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: CTaipale
- Subject: Re: Flute miking
-
- <"When you're miking a lot of players in a section,
you can
- generally Y identical mics on like instruments in pairs
- into an input.">
-
- Jim,
-
- A very helpful solution for combining dynamic mics, though
- condenser mics don't tend to like sharing that phantom
voltage.
- What have you done to accomodate sharing the phantom
voltage?
-
- Curt
-
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: Jim Brown
- Subject: Re: Flute miking
-
- <"What have you done to accommodate sharing the
phantom
- voltage?">
-
- Nothing special, but some of the mics may have been using
- batteries the times I've done it.
-
- How things work with phantom will depend on the mic and
the
- phantom supply in the console. Many mics don't need much
- phantom current, so they'll work fine, while others need
a
- bit more.
-
- I would expect the major problem with running out of
- phantom current to be a bit of pre-mature clipping (i.e,,
- with lower signal levels). But I wouldn't expect to see
- enough level from strings for this to be a big problem
with
- most mics.
-
- What's your experience?
-
- Jim Brown
- Audio Systems Group, Inc.
- Chicago
-
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: Curt Taipale
- Subject: Using mics with a Y-cord
-
- <"What's your experience?"> (re: sharing
phantom power with
- two condenser mics on the same input channel)
-
- Jim,
-
- I remember one time trying to Y two Neumann U87's, and
there
- definitely was a major drop in level. The difference
was so great -
- unusable - that I didn't take the time to see if there
was a
- corresponding difference in the character of the sound.
I want to say
- that I've tried this other times, but it's been a while
and I don't
- really remember. By comparison, I've Y-d two dynamic
mics many
- different times with very good results.
-
- On a side note, here's another issue. At the church I
used to work
- at, we had the house desk (a Harrison HM4) and the monitor
desk
- (a DDA) that shared all mic inputs on stage via a Y-cord
splitter.
- That is to say, because of a lack of budget at the time
the mic
- snake feeds were distributed to both consoles through
terminal
- strips mounted on a board under the stage - with no transformers.
- We managed to get away with it, and the plan was to add
transformers
- a handful at a time. But those plans were never really
seen through,
- with only a handful of channels eventually receiving
transformers.
-
- We found through trial and error that whenever we would
connect a
- U87 (or any Neumann mic for that matter) to any channel
without a
- transformer, that the output signal from that mic would
go way down
- in level. It's been some time so I don't really recall
how much,
- but something on the order of 6dB to 12 dB. If we simply
unplugged
- the snake input to the monitor desk the mic would react
- normally.
-
- I never researched it much further. We found the way
around it,
- and went on to other things. Any ideas? I suspected that
the monitor
- desk was loading down the Neumann output. Interestingly
enough, it
- was only the Neumanns (U87 and KM84) that had this problem.
The
- AKG414's or any other mic we used had no apparent problems
at all.
-
- Blessings!
-
- Curt
-
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: Rick Chinn
- Subject: Re: Using mics with Y cords
-
- Curt, I've wye'd my U87's and KM84's between house and
monitor desks
- without trouble.
-
- One possible problem: these are both phantom powered
mics, and both
- depend on the phantom voltage to be somewhere in the
vicinity of 48V.
-
- I'll try to keep this brief: take the case of two boards,
both of
- which have global phantom power switches. there is no
convention for
- the circuit location of the phantom power enable switch.
Sometimes it
- is at the very input to the phantom power supply (ac
from the power
- transformer). Other times they let the regulator run
all the time,
- and switch the feed to all the phantom resistors.
-
- If the designer took the first option, then with the
two consoles
- paralleled via the Y cord, the phantom power from console
1 (phantom
- supplier) feeds back into console 2, through its phantom
feed
- resistors, back into the power supply. I call this phenomenom
- "backwashing the power supply."
-
- Now there's nothing to guarantee how the supply will
react to having
- power shoved into a terminal that ordinarily is its output.
So,
- usually, the supply just acts like a load on power coming
through the
- phantom feed resistors. Net result: it loads the phantom
supply coming
- from console #1.
-
- With the Neumann mikes, this would lower the phantom
voltage
- presented to the mike, which also means that the polarization
- voltage delivered to the capsule would be lower, and
the
- output level would suffer as a result.
-
- If the designer took option 2, then it'll probably work.
-
- In the Mackie SR24.4/32.4 boards, I took option 1 as
it was easier
- from a wiring standpoint. BUT I put a diode in series
with the
- output of the phantom regulator so that you could backwash
it
- as described above without the regulator presenting a
load
- as described. So, here you can get away with it.
-
- The VLZ mixers (1202, 1402, 1604) mixers use a different
phantom
- regulator and from inspection, look like they'll withstand
being
- backwashed. But I have not tried this, so there are no
- promises here.
-
- So, if you're presented with two boards that took option
1, the
- solution is to turn the phantom power on at both boards.
This
- makes twice the current available, and it doesn't seem
to matter.
- I've done this many times, with mikes ranging from cheap
EV
- electrets, AKG's and Neumanns. BTW, the Neumann's, drawing
- very little current, would be affected by double phantom
power
- sourcing the least. The AKGs, especially the 9-52V ones,
- are affected the most, and the C451's that I've done
this
- to have not complained.
-
- If you have 2 boards, and one has individual phantom
switches
- and the other doesn't, let the one that has the global
- switch provide phantom powering.
-
- Rick Chinn
- Uneeda Audio
-
-
Main
Menu | Soundcheck Articles | Consulting
| Church Soundcheck Discussion Group
Discussion
Group Threads
| Job Listings | Links
| Workshops & Seminars
Who
Are We? | Soundcheck Resources | Contact
Us
Taipale Media
Systems, Inc.
Voice: 888-547-1727 or 972-747-8083 / Fax: 972-747-8084